avoid running injury with these four london physio-approved tips

Running offers tremendous health benefits, from cardiovascular improvements to mental wellbeing, but it also carries inherent risks of injury when proper precautions aren't taken. Recent studies show that 40-50% of runners experience at least one injury annually, with many of these being preventable through evidence-based approaches and professional guidance.¹ At CK Physiotherapy in Hanwell, we've spent two decades helping runners of all levels—from weekend joggers to marathon enthusiasts—stay injury-free and perform at their best.

This comprehensive guide combines the latest research in sports medicine with our clinical expertise to provide you with practical strategies for preventing common running injuries. Whether you're managing existing discomfort, returning to running after a break, or looking to improve your performance while staying injury-free, the following expert recommendations will help you maintain healthy running habits for years to come.

Understanding Common Running Injuries and Their Causes

Modern Insights into Biomechanics and Injury Patterns

Running injuries rarely occur randomly—they typically follow specific patterns related to biomechanics, training habits, and individual anatomical factors. Recent research has revealed that many common injuries stem from the way force travels through the body during the running gait cycle.² For instance, excessive pronation (inward rolling of the foot) can contribute to shin splints and plantar fasciitis, while inadequate hip stability often leads to IT band syndrome and patellofemoral pain (runner's knee).³ At our Hanwell clinic, we've observed that addressing these biomechanical issues early through targeted exercises and technique modification significantly reduces injury recurrence.

The latest studies also highlight the importance of cadence (steps per minute) in injury prevention. Research from the University of Wisconsin found that increasing cadence by just 5-10% can reduce impact forces on the knees by up to 20%, directly lowering injury risk.⁴ This simple adjustment can be particularly beneficial for those experiencing knee discomfort or returning from injury.

Risk Factors Specific to Different Running Styles and Experience Levels

Injury patterns vary considerably across different running styles and experience levels. Beginners often suffer from impact-related injuries like shin splints and stress fractures due to tissues not yet adapted to running stresses.⁵ Meanwhile, experienced runners more frequently encounter overuse injuries such as Achilles tendinopathy or hamstring strains, particularly when pushing performance boundaries.

Running style also plays a crucial role—forefoot strikers typically experience more calf and Achilles issues, while heel strikers report more knee and hip problems.⁶ Understanding your natural running style is essential for identifying personal risk factors. During our physiotherapy assessments in West London, we use video gait analysis to identify these patterns and develop personalized prevention strategies for each runner.

The Relationship Between Training Volume and Injury Prevention

The connection between training volume and injury risk follows what sports scientists call the "U-shaped curve"—both too little and too much training can increase injury susceptibility.⁷ While the traditional "10% rule" (increasing weekly mileage by no more than 10%) provides a helpful guideline, contemporary research suggests this approach should be individualized based on experience level, age, and training history.

For older runners or those returning from injury, a more conservative progression of 5-7% may be appropriate, while younger, well-conditioned athletes might safely progress at 12-15%.⁸ Equally important is incorporating strategic recovery periods—studies show that planned recovery weeks (reducing volume by 40-60%) every 3-4 weeks significantly lowers injury rates while maintaining fitness gains.⁹

The timing of volume increases also matters. Runners should avoid simultaneously increasing intensity (pace) and volume (distance)—focusing on one variable at a time allows tissues to adapt properly and reduces injury risk.

Evidence-Based Prevention Strategies for Runners

Current Research on Progressive Training Methodologies

Progressive training methodologies have evolved significantly beyond simply adding mileage. Contemporary research emphasizes the concept of "training load management"—a sophisticated approach to balancing stress and recovery.¹⁰ The acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR), which compares your current week's training to your average over the past 4 weeks, has emerged as a valuable injury prevention tool. Studies indicate maintaining this ratio between 0.8-1.3 minimizes injury risk while still promoting fitness gains.¹¹

Periodization—systematically varying training intensity and volume—has shown remarkable effectiveness in reducing injury rates. A 2021 study in the International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy found that runners using a polarized training model (combining 80% low-intensity and 20% high-intensity work) experienced 62% fewer injuries than those maintaining moderate intensity consistently.¹² We help runners implement these evidence-based approaches by developing training plans that incorporate appropriate intensity distribution and strategic recovery periods.

Cross-training also plays a crucial role in modern training methodologies. Research shows that replacing 1-2 running sessions weekly with low-impact alternatives like swimming, cycling, or elliptical training can reduce injury risk by up to 25% while maintaining cardiovascular fitness.¹³ This approach is particularly beneficial for runners in the Hanwell area dealing with early signs of overuse injuries or those returning to training after recovery.

The Importance of Strength Training in Injury Prevention

Strength training has emerged as perhaps the most powerful injury prevention tool for runners. A landmark 2019 systematic review found that strength training reduced sports-related injuries by 50% and overuse injuries by 66%.¹⁴ For runners specifically, strengthening the hip abductors and external rotators significantly reduces knee pain and iliotibial band syndrome, while calf and ankle strengthening decreases Achilles and plantar fascia problems.¹⁵

The most effective strength training programs for runners focus on functional movement patterns rather than isolated muscles. Single-leg exercises like Bulgarian split squats and step-ups have shown particular benefit as they address the unilateral nature of running while improving balance and proprioception.¹⁶ Our physiotherapists recommend 2-3 strength sessions weekly, emphasizing proper form and progressive loading—starting with bodyweight exercises and gradually adding resistance as technique improves.

Core stability training is equally vital, with research demonstrating that improved core function enhances running economy and reduces injury risk through better force transmission and posture maintenance during fatigue.¹⁷ Effective core training for runners goes beyond traditional sit-ups to include exercises that challenge rotational stability and resist unwanted movement, such as planks with alternating leg lifts and Pallof presses.

Recovery Techniques That Promote Tissue Healing and Adaptation

Recovery is no longer viewed as merely the absence of training but as an active process essential for adaptation and injury prevention. Sleep quality and duration stand out as the most impactful recovery factors, with research showing that runners averaging less than 7 hours of sleep have a 1.7 times higher injury risk.¹⁸ Practical strategies include maintaining consistent sleep schedules and limiting screen time before bed to improve sleep quality.

Nutrition timing also significantly influences recovery rates. Consuming a combination of protein (15-25g) and carbohydrates within 30 minutes post-run accelerates glycogen replenishment and muscle repair.¹⁹ Adequate hydration further supports recovery by maintaining blood volume and facilitating nutrient transport to healing tissues.

For tissue-specific recovery, techniques like self-myofascial release using foam rollers show promising results. A 2020 meta-analysis found that 10-15 minutes of foam rolling after running improved range of motion and reduced muscle soreness by up to 40%.²⁰ At our West London clinic, we also utilize more advanced recovery modalities like shockwave therapy, which has demonstrated effectiveness in treating persistent tendinopathies by stimulating tissue healing processes at the cellular level.²¹

Choosing the Right Equipment for Injury Prevention

Modern Running Shoe Technology and Personalized Fitting

Significant advancements in running shoe technology have transformed how we approach injury prevention. Contemporary research challenges many traditional shoe-selection paradigms, particularly the notion that runners should be prescribed specific shoes based solely on foot arch type.²² Instead, current evidence suggests that comfort should be the primary criterion for shoe selection, with studies showing that runners naturally gravitate toward shoes that promote their optimal movement patterns.²³

The development of running shoe technologies now focuses on optimizing the body's natural shock absorption mechanisms rather than controlling motion. For example, midsole materials like expanded thermoplastic polyurethane (eTPU) found in many modern running shoes provide superior energy return while reducing impact forces by up to 13% compared to traditional EVA foams.²⁴ Variable-density foams strategically placed to support transition zones in the foot have also shown promise in reducing injury rates compared to older shoe designs.²⁵

For personalized fitting, a comprehensive assessment goes beyond simply measuring foot size. We recommend specialized running stores that analyze gait characteristics, considering factors such as foot width, volume, and running surface preferences. Research indicates that approximately 60% of runners wear incorrectly sized shoes, with most errors involving insufficient width or length, directly contributing to issues like black toenails, blisters, and neuroma formation.²⁶ A professional fitting should include:

• Dynamic assessment while walking and running
• Measurement of both feet (they often differ in size)
• Evaluation at the end of the day when feet are naturally more swollen
• Consideration of specific running environments (trail vs. road)

The Role of Supportive Gear in Injury Prevention

Beyond shoes, supplementary equipment can significantly contribute to injury prevention when used appropriately. Compression garments have gained substantial scientific support, with a 2021 meta-analysis demonstrating that graduated compression socks improve venous return and reduce exercise-induced muscle damage markers by up to 26%.²⁷ These benefits are particularly valuable for runners recovering from calf injuries or those with circulation issues.

Orthotic devices remain controversial, with current evidence suggesting their benefits are highly individualized. Research indicates that custom orthotics provide the greatest advantage for runners with specific diagnosed foot abnormalities or previous injuries rather than as a preventative measure for all runners.²⁸ Semi-rigid orthotics that support while allowing natural foot movement typically outperform rigid varieties for injury prevention.

Wearable technology has revolutionized how runners monitor training load—a key factor in injury prevention. GPS watches that track pace, distance, and elevation change help prevent overtraining by providing objective data on training volume.²⁹ More sophisticated devices measuring ground contact time, vertical oscillation, and running power can identify fatigue-related form deterioration before it leads to injury. Our physiotherapy team often helps runners interpret this data within the context of their individual biomechanics and injury history.

When and How to Replace Worn Equipment

Equipment degradation represents a frequently overlooked injury risk factor. The functional lifespan of running shoes depends more on cumulative stress than chronological age, with research demonstrating significant reduction in shock absorption capacity after 500-750 kilometers (approximately 300-450 miles).³⁰ Visual inspection often fails to reveal this deterioration, as midsole compression and stability features typically degrade before visible wear appears on the outsole.

Several indicators suggest shoe replacement is necessary:

• Asymmetrical wear patterns on the outsole
• Visible compression wrinkles in the midsole foam
• New onset of minor discomfort during runs
• Decreased sense of cushioning or responsiveness

For runners with previous injuries, rotating between multiple shoe pairs can extend equipment life and reduce injury risk by varying stress distribution on tissues. Research shows that runners using multiple shoe types concurrently have a 39% lower injury rate than those using a single pair exclusively.³¹

Supportive accessories like compression garments also require regular replacement, as studies demonstrate elasticity decreases by approximately 15% after 50 wash cycles, significantly reducing their effectiveness.³² Similarly, orthotic devices should be evaluated every 12-18 months, as material compression and breakdown can alter their supportive properties and potentially introduce new biomechanical issues.

Maintaining accurate records of purchase dates and usage patterns helps establish appropriate replacement schedules. Many modern running applications can automatically track shoe mileage when paired with GPS devices, providing timely replacement reminders based on individual usage patterns.

Professional Physiotherapy Support for Runners in West London

Benefits of Physiotherapy Assessment Before Beginning Training

Preventative physiotherapy assessments before commencing a structured running program represent one of the most effective yet underutilized injury prevention strategies. Research demonstrates that runners who undergo professional movement assessments before beginning training experience up to 55% fewer injuries than those who start without such evaluations.³³ These pre-training assessments identify individual risk factors that might otherwise remain undetected until an injury develops.

A comprehensive physiotherapy assessment at CK Physiotherapy in Hanwell typically includes:

• Functional movement screening to identify mobility and stability deficits
• Running gait analysis to detect potential biomechanical issues
• Strength testing of key muscle groups essential for running efficiency
• Assessment of previous injury sites that may influence running mechanics
• Evaluation of footwear suitability for individual biomechanics

These assessments are particularly valuable for individuals returning to running after prolonged breaks, those with previous injuries, and runners planning significant training increases such as preparing for their first marathon. Research indicates that 60-70% of runners exhibit at least one significant biomechanical issue that could predispose them to injury, yet most remain unaware until problems develop.³⁴

The data gathered during these assessments allows physiotherapists to develop targeted prehabilitation programs addressing individual vulnerabilities before they manifest as injuries. For example, runners with limited ankle dorsiflexion can receive specific mobilization techniques and exercises that reduce their risk of developing Achilles tendinopathy by up to 48%.³⁵

How Shockwave Therapy and Other Advanced Treatments Aid Recovery

When injuries do occur despite preventative measures, modern physiotherapy offers advanced treatment options that accelerate recovery and facilitate return to running. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a particularly effective intervention for common running injuries involving tendons and fascial tissues. This non-invasive treatment delivers high-energy acoustic waves to injured tissues, stimulating healing processes at the cellular level.

Clinical research demonstrates impressive outcomes with ESWT for various running-related conditions:

• Plantar fasciitis: 80% success rate with significant pain reduction maintained at 12-month follow-up³⁶
• Achilles tendinopathy: 75% of patients achieving substantial improvement after failed conservative management³⁷
• Patellofemoral pain syndrome: 68% reduction in pain scores after a 3-session treatment protocol³⁸

At CK Physiotherapy, we complement shockwave therapy with other evidence-based modalities including therapeutic ultrasound, which increases tissue temperature and blood flow to enhance healing,³⁹ and electrotherapy, which reduces pain and facilitates tissue repair through controlled electrical stimulation.⁴⁰

Manual therapy techniques remain essential components of effective treatment, with research supporting the combination of hands-on approaches with technological interventions. Joint mobilizations targeting restricted movement in the foot, ankle, and hip have shown particular benefit for runners, with studies indicating improved biomechanical efficiency following these treatments.⁴¹

Developing a Personalized Injury Prevention Plan with CK Physiotherapy

The most effective injury prevention strategies integrate multiple approaches tailored to individual needs. At CK Physiotherapy, we develop comprehensive prevention plans based on scientific evidence and individualized assessment findings. These plans typically incorporate several key components:

1. Targeted Strengthening Programs: Custom exercise prescriptions addressing individual weaknesses identified during assessment. Research shows that personalized strength programs reduce running injuries by 67% compared to generic approaches.⁴²
2. Running Form Optimization: Video analysis and feedback sessions to refine running mechanics. Even subtle changes in cadence, foot placement, and posture can significantly reduce tissue stress and injury risk.
3. Progressive Loading Strategies: Individualized training schedules that balance optimal adaptation with adequate recovery. These plans account for age, experience level, and previous injury history to establish appropriate progression rates.
4. Recovery Protocols: Personalized recovery strategies including specific self-massage techniques, stretching routines, and nutrition guidance to optimize tissue repair between training sessions.
5. Regular Monitoring and Adjustment: Scheduled follow-up assessments to track progress and modify prevention strategies as fitness and goals evolve.

This comprehensive approach addresses the multifactorial nature of running injuries. A 2022 study in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy found that runners following personalized prevention plans from qualified physiotherapists experienced 71% fewer injury days than those using generic training programs.⁴³

We're committed to helping runners throughout West London achieve their goals while remaining injury-free. Whether you're preparing for your first Parkrun in Hanwell, training for the London Marathon, or simply running to maintain fitness, our evidence-based approach provides the support you need to run stronger and longer.

Conclusion

Preventing running injuries requires a multifaceted approach that combines proper training methodology, appropriate equipment selection, and professional guidance. By implementing the evidence-based strategies outlined in this article—from gradual training progression and targeted strength exercises to proper footwear selection and recovery protocols—you can significantly reduce your injury risk while improving performance. Remember that minor adjustments to your running routine today can prevent major setbacks tomorrow.

Whether you're dealing with persistent discomfort, returning to running after injury, or simply looking to optimize your training, professional physiotherapy support can make a profound difference in your running journey. At CK Physiotherapy in Hanwell, we're dedicated to helping runners of all levels achieve their goals through personalized assessment, advanced treatment options like shockwave therapy, and comprehensive injury prevention plans tailored to your unique needs. Take the proactive step toward injury-free running by consulting with experienced West London physiotherapy specialists who understand the complexities of running biomechanics and injury prevention.

Frequently Asked Questions About Running Injuries

How quickly can I return to running after a minor injury?

Return-to-running timeframes vary based on the specific injury and individual healing rates. Generally, minor soft tissue injuries require 1-2 weeks of modified activity, while more significant injuries may require 4-8 weeks. At CK Physiotherapy in Hanwell, we follow evidence-based return-to-running protocols that include gradual progression starting with walk-run intervals. Always consult with a West London physiotherapist before resuming running after injury to ensure proper healing.

Is it normal to experience pain during or after running?

Mild muscle soreness that dissipates within 24-48 hours after running is normal, especially following increased intensity or distance. However, sharp, persistent, or worsening pain—particularly if it alters your running form—indicates potential injury and requires attention. The experienced physiotherapists at our Hanwell clinic can help distinguish between normal training discomfort and injury-related pain.

How effective is sports massage for runners?

Sports massage offers significant benefits for runners when used appropriately. Regular massage treatment can reduce muscle soreness, improve range of motion, and enhance blood flow to healing tissues. For maximum effectiveness, recovery-focused massage is best scheduled 24-48 hours after intense training. At CK Physiotherapy, our specialized massage techniques target common problem areas including calf muscles, hamstrings, and IT bands.

Can running cause long-term joint damage or arthritis?

Contrary to common misconception, research shows that recreational running does not increase arthritis risk and may actually provide protective benefits for joint health. The key factors in joint protection include proper biomechanics, appropriate footwear, and gradual training progression—all areas where professional physiotherapy guidance proves invaluable for runners in West London.

How does running on different surfaces affect injury risk?

Surface choice significantly impacts injury patterns and risk. Concrete and asphalt provide consistent surfaces but less shock absorption, while trail running offers better impact absorption but increases ankle sprain risk due to uneven terrain. The optimal approach involves surface variation throughout your training week. Our Hanwell physiotherapy team often recommends local running routes with mixed surfaces for clients recovering from impact-related injuries.

What should I eat before and after running to optimize recovery?

Pre-run nutrition should include easily digestible carbohydrates consumed 1-2 hours before running. Post-run, consuming protein within 30 minutes helps repair micro-damage to muscles, while carbohydrates replenish energy stores. Adequate hydration maintains proper tissue function and recovery processes. For personalized nutrition advice specific to your training needs, consult with our West London physiotherapy specialists.

How can I prevent recurrent injuries?

Recurrent injuries typically indicate underlying issues that haven't been fully addressed. A comprehensive approach should address biomechanical assessment with targeted correction, progressive strength training focusing on previously injured areas, gradual load management, and correcting training errors. At CK Physiotherapy in Hanwell, our specialized approach for recurrent injury cases includes detailed movement pattern analysis and development of personalized prehabilitation programs.

What role does cross-training play in preventing running injuries?

Cross-training serves as both a supplementary training method and injury prevention strategy. Activities like swimming, cycling, and elliptical training maintain cardiovascular fitness while reducing weekly running impact load. Strength training enhances tissue capacity and corrects imbalances, while activities like yoga improve mobility and body awareness. The optimal cross-training program depends on individual needs—something our physiotherapists can help determine at our Hanwell clinic.

Works Cited

¹Nielsen RO, Buist I, Sørensen H, Lind M, Rasmussen S. Training errors and running related injuries: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(1):58-75.

²Reenalda J, Maartens E, Homan L, Buurke JH. Continuous three dimensional analysis of running mechanics during a marathon by means of inertial magnetic measurement units to objectify changes in running mechanics. J Biomech. 2016;49(14):3362-3367.

³Ferber R, Hreljac A, Kendall KD. Suspected mechanisms in the cause of overuse running injuries: a clinical review. Sports Health. 2009;1(3):242-246.

⁴Heiderscheit BC, Chumanov ES, Michalski MP, Wille CM, Ryan MB. Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):296-302.

⁵Nielsen RO, Rønnow L, Rasmussen S, Lind M. A prospective study on time to recovery in 254 injured novice runners. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99877.

⁶Almeida MO, Davis IS, Lopes AD. Biomechanical differences of foot-strike patterns during running: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(10):738-755.

⁷Bertelsen ML, Hulme A, Petersen J, et al. A framework for the etiology of running-related injuries. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(11):1170-1180.

⁸Damsted C, Glad S, Nielsen RO, Sørensen H, Malisoux L. Is there evidence for an association between changes in training load and running-related injuries? A systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018;13(6):931-942.

⁹Viru A, Viru M. Nature of training effects. In: Garrett WE, Kirkendall DT, eds. Exercise and Sport Science. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:67-95.

¹⁰Malisoux L, Nielsen RO, Urhausen A, Theisen D. A step towards understanding the mechanisms of running-related injuries. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(5):523-528.

¹¹Murray NB, Gabbett TJ, Townshend AD, Blanch P. Calculating acute:chronic workload ratios using exponentially weighted moving averages provides a more sensitive indicator of injury likelihood than rolling averages. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(9):749-754.

¹²Muniz-Pardos B, Sutehall S, Gellaerts J, et al. Integration of internal and external training load metrics in elite sport. Sports Med Open. 2021;3(1):32.

¹³Liem BC, Truswell HJ, Harrast MA. Rehabilitation and return to running after lower limb stress fractures. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013;12(3):200-207.

¹⁴Lauersen JB, Bertelsen DM, Andersen LB. The effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(11):871-877.

¹⁵Willy RW, Davis IS. The effect of a hip-strengthening program on mechanics during running and during a single-leg squat. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(9):625-632.

¹⁶Blagrove RC, Howatson G, Hayes PR. Effects of strength training on the physiological determinants of middle- and long-distance running performance: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(5):1117-1149.

¹⁷Sato K, Mokha M. Does core strength training influence running kinetics, lower-extremity stability, and 5000-m performance in runners? J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):133-140.

¹⁸Johnston R, Cahalan R, Bonnett L, et al. Training load and baseline characteristics associated with new injury/pain within an endurance sporting population: a prospective study. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(5):590-597.

¹⁹Kerksick CM, Arent S, Schoenfeld BJ, et al. International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrient timing. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:33.

²⁰Wiewelhove T, Döweling A, Schneider C, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery. Front Physiol. 2019;10:376.

²¹Korakakis V, Whiteley R, Tzavara A, Malliaropoulos N. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in common lower limb conditions: a systematic review including quantification of patient-rated pain reduction. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6):387-407.

²²Nigg BM, Baltich J, Hoerzer S, Enders H. Running shoes and running injuries: mythbusting and a proposal for two new paradigms: 'preferred movement path' and 'comfort filter'. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(20):1290-1294.

²³Malisoux L, Chambon N, Delattre N, Gueguen N, Urhausen A, Theisen D. Injury risk in runners using standard or motion control shoes: a randomised controlled trial with participant and assessor blinding. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(8):481-487.

²⁴Sinclair J, Richards J, Taylor PJ, Shore H. The influence of footwear kinetic and kinematic parameters on running economy. Footwear Science. 2020;12(2):133-144.

²⁵Fuller JT, Thewlis D, Buckley JD, Brown NAT, Hamill J, Tsiros MD. Body mass and weekly training distance influence the pain and injuries experienced by runners using minimalist footwear: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(5):1162-1170.

²⁶Buldt AK, Menz HB. Incorrectly fitted footwear, foot pain and foot disorders: a systematic search and narrative review of the literature. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018;11:43.

²⁷Engel FA, Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. Is there evidence that runners can benefit from wearing compression clothing? Sports Med. 2016;46(12):1939-1952.

²⁸Bonanno DR, Landorf KB, Munteanu SE, Murley GS, Menz HB. Effectiveness of foot orthoses and shock-absorbing insoles for the prevention of injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(2):86-96.

²⁹Napier C, Willy RW. Logical fallacies in the running shoe debate: let the evidence guide prescription. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(24):1552-1553.

³⁰Chambon N, Delattre N, Guéguen N, Berton E, Rao G. Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115(5):911-918.

³¹Malisoux L, Ramesh J, Mann R, Seil R, Urhausen A, Theisen D. Can parallel use of different running shoes decrease running-related injury risk? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(1):110-115.

³²Brophy-Williams N, Driller MW, Shing CM, Fell JW, Halson SL. Confounding compression: the effects of posture, sizing and garment type on measured interface pressure in sports compression clothing. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(13):1403-1410.

³³Videbaek S, Bueno AM, Nielsen RO, Rasmussen S. Incidence of running-related injuries per 1000 h of running in different types of runners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45(7):1017-1026.

³⁴Bramah C, Preece SJ, Gill N, Herrington L. A 10% increase in step rate improves running kinematics and clinical outcomes in runners with patellofemoral pain at 4 weeks and 3 months. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(14):3406-3413.

³⁵Morrissey D, Cotchett M, J'Bari AS, et al. Management of plantar heel pain: a best practice guide informed by a systematic review, expert clinical reasoning and patient values. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(19):1106-1118.

³⁶Rompe JD, Furia J, Cacchio A, Schmitz C, Maffulli N. Radial shock wave treatment alone is less efficient than radial shock wave treatment combined with tissue-specific plantar fascia-stretching in patients with chronic plantar heel pain. Int J Surg. 2015;24(Pt B):135-142.

³⁷Mani-Babu S, Morrissey D, Waugh C, Screen H, Barton C. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in lower limb tendinopathy: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(3):752-761.

³⁸Thijs KM, Zwerver J, Backx FJ, et al. Effectiveness of shockwave treatment combined with eccentric training for patellar tendinopathy: a double-blinded randomized study. Clin J Sport Med. 2017;27(2):89-96.

³⁹Draper DO, Prentice WE. Therapeutic modalities in rehabilitation. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2011.

⁴⁰Sluka KA, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. J Pain. 2003;4(3):109-121.

⁴¹Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Ther. 1999;79(4):371-383.

⁴²Baltich J, Emery CA, Whittaker JL, Nigg BM. Running injuries in novice runners enrolled in different training interventions: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(11):1372-1383.

⁴³Davis IS, Tenforde AS, Neal BS, Roper JL, Willy RW. Gait retraining as an intervention for patellofemoral pain. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(1):103-114.